The endpoint agents communicated pretty well with the Symantec server and the server had capabilities for the administrators to go ahead and look at the different logs. All it needed was a server and the endpoint agents, which could be very easily deployed across the entire environment using the SCCM server. It was pretty much easy to implement Symantec Endpoint Protection. So overall, the ability of the applications to get us the needed information as a Security Engineer was amazing. At the same time, they are very well integrated into Splunk, which is our SIM. All the applications are very well connected to each other. And it's very well-integrated environment. The biggest reason of choosing Symantec Endpoint Protection was its wide range of applications across the Symantec Suite. In addition, the overall protection plan offered by Symantec works much into our budget in comparison with that at McAfee. The entire suite made us choose Symantec Endpoint Protection over McAfee. But the wide range of Semantic Suite of applications which spread across the Endpoint Protection Software, the Data Leakage Prevention Software, the Cloud Access Security Broker, and whatnot. Why it's using Symantec Endpoint Protection? We considered McAfee antivirus as well. I would like to give Symantec Endpoint Protection three stars. Anshuman: Hi, my name is Anshuman, and I'm a security engineer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |